Media Advocacy or Just Laziness?

February 13th, the Washington Post ran a column by Steven Pearlstein in the Business section where Mr. Pearstein advocates a portion of the War on Prosperity Bill relating to healthcare. Mr. Pearlstein is not unique is his position in the news media, but it is curious how it is contrary to another long advocated position in the news media – a woman’s right to chose. One of the easily remembered arguments of the right to choice crowd is that the government should not be dictating the decisions made between a woman and her doctor. Mr. Pearlstein’s third paragraph contains “…[treatments]…no longer be prescribed.”  The reason they aren’t prescribed is decided by a bureaucracy, not a woman and her doctor.

Mr. Pearlstein has been a employee of the Post for some time and I doubt he is a “right to life” advocate. What is much more likely is that as is the case with many other reporters, much of his reporting is simply re-writing press releases with little consideration to the  accuracy of their content.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s